Farm Debt Repayment Stretched Over More Years

Posted by David Widmar on October 21, 2019

Farm debt has received increased attention in recent years. Over the last two decades, farm debt has trended higher – approaching levels last observed in the 1980s.  Even as farm income has turned higher, producers are still relying on higher levels of debt. Offsetting some of the challenges of high debt levels have been low-interest rates and interest expenses.  This week’s post considers another important trend in farm debt – longer repayment terms.

All Non-Real Estate Debt

Figure 1 shows the annual average repayment terms on all non-real estate farm loans. Since the 2000s, this measure spent most of its time between 12 and 14 months. That said, two considerations are worth noting. First, notice the dip in repayment terms between 2008 and 2009. As the U.S. economy entered the Great Recession – fueled by the housing finance market- repayment terms sharply contracted. Specifically, average repayment terms fell from 13.8 in 2008 to slightly less than 11 months. Not only was the change significant, but it also swung from highs to lows in just a year. Repayment terms would not again exceed 14 months until 2012.

The second observation is that non-real estate loans have been termed out over more years over time, especially in recent years. This is a trend Brent first noted three years ago. In 2018, the average repayment term on all non-real estate loans was 15.4 months. This is the highest level observed in Figure 1. Furthermore, it is the highest annual observations noted in the data series, dating back to 1977 (not shown in Figure 1).

Plotting a trend-line in figure 1 from 2000 to 2018 (not shown) reveals that repayment terms increased at a rate of 1 month added every six years.

farm debt repayment. ag trends. ag economic insights
Figure 1. Annual Average Repayment Term in Months on All Non-Real Estate Farm Loans at Commercial Banks, 2000-2018. Data Source: Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank, Agricultural Finance Databook.


Machinery & Equipment

Digging into something more tangible, figure 2 shows average annual repayment terms for farm machinery and equipment loans. Again, the trend has been towards higher rates over time. In the early 2000s, loan terms were often around 25 months. Repayment terms reached more than 40 months in 2013 and 2015. Most recently, repayment terms have fallen to nearly 34 months in 2018. While this is lower than recent years, terms remain historically long. Again, these data have been tracked by the Kansas City Federal Reserve since 1977, and over the last 42 years only in 7 years (17% of the time) have farm machinery and equipment loans been termed over more months (33.9 months in 2018).

Between 2000 and 2010, the average repayment term on machinery was 23.4 months. 2018’s levels of 33.9 represent repayment terms that are 45% longer.


farm debt repayment. ag trends. ag speaker
Figure 2. Annual Average Repayment Term in Months on Machinery and Equipment Farm Loans at Commercial Banks, 2000-2018. Data Source: Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank, Agricultural Finance Databook.



Another category of farm loans to consider are livestock loans. Figure 3 shows the average annual terms on “other livestock” loans. Specifically, these are livestock loans that are not for “feeder livestock,” such as feeder cattle. Consistent with earlier data, repayment terms have also extended over time. In 2018, this reached a high of 18.4 months. This is much higher than the average of 11.5 months between 2000 and 2010. In fact, stretching from 11.5 months to 18.4 is a 60% increase.


farm debt repayment. ag economic insights. 2019. aei.a
Figure 3. Annual Average Repayment Term in Months on Other Livestock Farm Loans at Commercial Banks, 2000-2018. Data Source: Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank, Agricultural Finance Databook.


Wrapping it Up

In recent years, the farm economy has relied upon higher debt. This was observed for farm machinery, livestock, and all non-real estate loans.

On the one hand, longer repayment terms – coupled with historically low-interest rates- makes it easier for producers to meet the annual debt service obligations of historically high debt levels. Longer terms and low rates are certainly preferred to a scenario of 1) short repayment terms and 2) high-interest rates.

On the other hand, the extended debt terms leave producers “on the hook” for a longer period of time. For machinery and livestock, terms in 2018 were 10-12 months longer compared to 2000-2010. While the annual obligation is lower, the number of year obligated have increased.

Click here to subscribe to AEI’s Weekly Insights and receive our free, in-depth articles in your inbox every Monday morning.

But wait, there’s more: click here to visit the archive of our articles – hundreds of them – and to browse by topic. We hope you will continue the conversation with us on Twitter and Facebook.

Share article: